I’m not an artist. Still working on it. Please, we welcome submissions. As far as can be seen, Chiss have red sclera and red pupils. Currently the basis of this decision is from The 501st Legion costume reference library that allows red eye contact lenses for full costume approval. So it seems in the generalContinue reading “The Chiss ups would be better if you shopped out facial/body hair and their pupils.”
Author Archives: Star Wars Actors Guild 77
There is a big following for Thrawn here on tumblr, but there is an even bigger following for the Chiss as a species. You may get more people on board if you reach out to the larger community: a quick search of the Chiss tag reveals a hive of current activity. Support through likes and reblogs of their content may result in more exposure for your content in return.
Thank you. Appreciate that. I have reached out and have gotten backlash because this blog is a part of the Star Wars Actors Guild 77 conglomerate of social media accounts. We operate on 4 other social media sites: Facebook, Twitter, Google+ and Pinterest, too. If people are interested in helping us, we would appreciate it.Continue reading “There is a big following for Thrawn here on tumblr, but there is an even bigger following for the Chiss as a species. You may get more people on board if you reach out to the larger community: a quick search of the Chiss tag reveals a hive of current activity. Support through likes and reblogs of their content may result in more exposure for your content in return.”
If Thrawn is included, the name may be all they keep and his personality may be changed beyond all recognition. Essentially, he may just be a vessel to get the Chiss species back into current canon. For example, if they made him incompetent, slow-witted, uncultured etc.- basically stripped back everything that makes Thrawn ‘Thrawn’. If this is the case, would you consider this a bit of a hollow victory, or just be happy that Chiss are back into canon?
Just answered part of your questions here (x) As far as cutting back his “persona”: Part of our PITCH says not to do that to him. Watering down THIS character for the Star Wars Rebels would make for bad storytelling and we think the creators KNOW this fact. The Disney executives do not. They think thatContinue reading “If Thrawn is included, the name may be all they keep and his personality may be changed beyond all recognition. Essentially, he may just be a vessel to get the Chiss species back into current canon. For example, if they made him incompetent, slow-witted, uncultured etc.- basically stripped back everything that makes Thrawn ‘Thrawn’. If this is the case, would you consider this a bit of a hollow victory, or just be happy that Chiss are back into canon?”
Would you see it as part of your goal to get just any Chiss character into Rebels, or does it absolutely have to be Thrawn? If the species was included in new episodes, would you consider that mission accomplished, or would you continue the push to get Thrawn in?
That’s a good question: Do we want to see “any Chiss” species in Star Wars Rebels? Well, you saw Agent Kallus ( agentkallus77 ) was suppose to be a Chiss. For some reason they went through many iterations of his character’s look and decided to create him as we see him today. So it is possibleContinue reading “Would you see it as part of your goal to get just any Chiss character into Rebels, or does it absolutely have to be Thrawn? If the species was included in new episodes, would you consider that mission accomplished, or would you continue the push to get Thrawn in?”
Free to post and ask
Generally the Star Wars Actors Guild 77 (SWAG 77) restricts our outside postings from aggressive people. We avoid any unnecessary Imperial entanglements… So it is new, we are allowing people to post. We are allowing anonymous questions, and we allow respectful questions that are well researched and understood of our circumstances. Any disrespectful questions willContinue reading “Free to post and ask”
You must be logged in to post a comment.