fbpx

If Thrawn is included, the name may be all they keep and his personality may be changed beyond all recognition. Essentially, he may just be a vessel to get the Chiss species back into current canon. For example, if they made him incompetent, slow-witted, uncultured etc.- basically stripped back everything that makes Thrawn ‘Thrawn’. If this is the case, would you consider this a bit of a hollow victory, or just be happy that Chiss are back into canon?

Just answered part of your questions here (x) As far as cutting back his “persona”: Part of our PITCH says not to do that to him. Watering down THIS character for the Star Wars Rebels would make for bad storytelling and we think the creators KNOW this fact.  The Disney executives do not. They think thatContinue reading “If Thrawn is included, the name may be all they keep and his personality may be changed beyond all recognition. Essentially, he may just be a vessel to get the Chiss species back into current canon. For example, if they made him incompetent, slow-witted, uncultured etc.- basically stripped back everything that makes Thrawn ‘Thrawn’. If this is the case, would you consider this a bit of a hollow victory, or just be happy that Chiss are back into canon?”